»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
Torchwood: “Children of the Earth” – was that the intended audience?
July 14th, 2009 by admin

On an Internet discussion forum I’d read about the television series Torchwood and the gay relationship within it. The most recent story being broadcast in five episodes with the name Children of the Earth.

I’m going to try not to give too much away of the “story” of Children of the Earth because I don’t want to spoil it for anyone who hasn’t seen it, however if you really want to watch it then don’t read on just in case. You’ll also spare yourself a dose of me sneering at it.

I did not like Children of the Earth, however there were a few very good things in it and I will mention them first.

  • I liked very much the nucleus of the story.
  • The children stopping and speaking in unison was extremely good, this was such a clever thing visually and achieved without a lot of special effects and suchlike.
  • The aliens are visually very concealed throughout the series, that was good, as soon as you see the monster or whatever in television then usually it is diffused.
  • The aliens’ basic use of English in their translation system was well used to increase their menace.
  • I liked the Whitehall politics.
  • The depiction of the Cardiff housing estate was warm, human and enjoyable to watch.
  • There was one good character, Mr Dekker played by Ian Gelder. He was the government expert on aliens. He was such a scumbag.

It was difficult to know if it was intended for children or adults. The vast majority of the content was too juvenile for an adult audience, but it included some scenes and ideas which would have been really inappropriate for children.

If it had been intended for children then it was the worst kind of children’s drama. The worst kind of children’s drama being one that thinks that children will just sit through any plot absurdity as long as there is some silly gadget or special effect coming soon. What a load of cobblers!

Captain Jack Harkness, played by John Barrowman, lives forever regenerating instead of dying after being shot or in a car accident or whatever. He recovers and heals up at an astonishing rate. What rubbish! How, for example, does his hair “know” to be the length it is? If he goes to the barber and gets his hair cut, surely it would immediately grow back? He should have hair down to his knees and a long beard.

In fact for me, everything to do with that Torchwood bunch was pretty dreadful really. The only thing I liked about them was that there was a gay relationship within it, but completely disassociated from the main story. They would not have bothered with a pointless straight relationship like that because it would not have had any story value. I watched the programme with an interest in this gay affair but I was bored by it. How great it would have been if it played a meaningful part in the story.

It was difficult to see, though, how anything could have played a part in that story. After all the solution to the problem presented by the aliens is in fact just some technical mumbo jumbo which was completely unconvincing. The “plot” was full of ridiculous holes and this just suggests to me that the programme’s writer has the lowest opinion of the viewers.

I know I could be accused of lacking the ability to suspend disbelief, but while characters with superman characteristics or silly gadgets are boring and signalling to me that this is not my kind of drama, what I really can’t stand at all is problems with the story itself.

The Permanent Secretary to the Foreign Office, John Frobisher is requested by the Prime Minister to perform a special event for the press with the objective of reassuring the general public. However this would not have been appropriate for a civil servant like John Frobisher, an elected politician would be necessary for this. Even if it had been possible with a civil servant it could not be successful because by and large the general public do not know the civil servants who work with the government, so if John Frobisher had appeared on their screens they wouldn’t have been reassured.

I was offended by the use of really extreme emotional situations which were so obviously contrived just to maintain the viewer’s interest in some way, maybe to shock them or perhaps try to cause them some anxiety. One parent shoots their partner and children, then commits suicide. All this to escape their fate, but if that parent had simply taken spouse and children on holiday for a couple of days then they would have evaded their fate just as easily. At one point a character sacrifices their own grand-child to save (some of) the human race. But this situation had been created out of nothing. Writing a drama in which parents kill their own children requires a great deal of consideration. You don’t just shove something like that in the story. What obnoxious drivel.

Children of the Earth was very ghoulish, too much so, I think, for the real children of the earth. If their parents/guardians prevented them from watching it they will have missed nothing.


One Response  
  • Simon McGuinness writes:
    October 30th, 2009 at 15:12

    Hello Patrick,
    Your criticism is sound and you have picked out some glaring holes. I too noted them. However I DID enjoy Children of the Earth. Torchwood is targeted for adults, it is after all a spin-off from Doctor Who that has a general public following, i.e. families. Torchwood’s audience are those who were childhood fans of Dr Who, notably Tom Baker and before.

    Although the use of CGi it is really a character driven topical format. It is the writing and the commentary on where we are at today. The relationship between Cptn Jack and Ianto did play a meaningful part in the story. It normalises a gay relationship that you rightfully found to be boring and that should be the same for everyone watching it. I get bored with love interests in films where it is about the action. Watching a couple take time out to exchange fluids and pillow talk for any coupling is superfluous. Russell T Davies os making a point, heavy as it appears to you, but I believe he is saying ‘get over it’ for the puritans and homophobic viewers.

    Peter Capaldi gave an excellent performance in a production that was evidently on a very very tight budget. So it was the story. The writing was what I enjoyed, the premises, the observation on today’s reasoning and personal and national politics. I especially loved the Whitehall meetings. The line about what school league tables are really for, when having to choose the children to be sacrificed. Loved it. As someone who came to this country to widen participation in higher education it was a howler.

    The big issue is Torchwood has a simple format. Something that tries to be sophisticated and thoughtful, like a lower quality version of House of Cards, directed by Paul Seed (who was coincidentally originally an actor, well known to Doctor Who fans for his portrayal of the Graff Vinda-K in the Tom Baker story, The Ribos Operation)
    So who is the real audience it is targeted at. The American market. There the audiences are bigger, more involved (with their Torchwood Conferences) and they spend millions of $ on this sh*t. The BBC are securing a source of income when the Tories/New Labour eventually pull the licence fee on them.
    To emphasise my point..
    http://www.bbcamerica.com/content/262/index.jsp
    compare it to the bbc.co.uk website on Torchwood
    Now the American audience are diverse and require a big common denominator, simplify the plot and the story. Although I do enjoy the quality US stuff like Scrubs and The Wire. Both on HBO not general terrestrial (sic) tv.

    I liked Torchwood. But I appreciate and agree with some of your criticisms and the obvious flaws. But the more they produce programmes where the things audiences today are surprised or note same sex couples involving the protagonist, or throw our language and subtexts into our ears and reveal our hypocrisies, and where help for London can come from Wales can’t be a bad thing. Besides the English (or British, if you like) love to grumble and whinge. Read Jeremy Paxmen’s “The English” or Dara O’Briain’s “Tickling the English”. It is in your blood. :-)

    All the best

    Simon

    PS: By the way, I enjoyed your website.


Leave a Reply

»  Substance: WordPress   »  Style: Ahren Ahimsa

Bad Behavior has blocked 258 access attempts in the last 7 days.